SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DIFFERENTIATION OF URBAN SPATIAL IN CHINA AND ITS IMPACT ON URBAN-RURAL COMMON PROSPERITY
YUAN Xiao-ling
1,2,3
, YANG Xin-biao
1,3
, LI Zhao-peng
1,3
1. School of Marxism, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
2. School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China;
3. Shaanxi Province Economic High-quality Development Soft Science Research Base, Xi'an 710061, China
摘要
城市空间质量的提升往往影响城市的高质量发展，进而影响城乡均衡以及城乡共同富裕的实现。文章试图构建系统的城市空间质量评价指标体系，对我国城市的空间质量进行评估，进而采用面板固定效应回归模型、非线性回归模型和空间杜宾模型（SDM）对2005—2020年间中国285个地级城市的城市空间质量与城乡共同富裕的关系进行实证研究，结果表明：①我国城市空间质量总体呈上升趋势，这种上升趋势呈现出时空异质性。②城市空间质量提升可显著促进城乡共同富裕，但由于二者之间存在倒“U”形关系，这种促进作用是城市发展到一定阶段才能实现的。③城市不同的空间类型对城乡共同富裕的影响不尽相同。④城市空间质量提升通过加快市场一体化与交通基础设施改善影响城乡共同富裕。
Abstract
：The improvement of urban space quality often affects the high-quality development of cities, which in turn affects the balance between urban and rural areas and the realization of urban-rural co-prosperity. The article attempts to construct a systematic system of urban space quality evaluation indicators to evaluate the space quality of China's cities, and then uses panel fixed effect regression model, nonlinear regression model and spatial Dubin model (SDM) conducted empirical research on the relationship between urban spatial quality and urban-rural co-prosperity in 285 prefecture-level cities in China from 2005 to 2020. The results show that: 1) The urban space quality in China is generally on the upward trend, and this upward trend shows spatial and temporal heterogeneity. 2) Urban spatial quality can significantly promote the common prosperity of urban and rural areas, but because of the inverted "U" shape relationship between the two, this promotion can only be achieved at a certain stage of urban development. 3) Different spatial types of cities have different impacts on common affluence between urban and rural areas. 4) Improving urban space quality affects urban and rural common prosperity through accelerated market integration and improvement of transport infrastructure.
Key words
：
urban spatial quality
common prosperity
urban-rural income gap
market integration
商玉萍,潘洲,孟美侠.中国城市多中心空间战略的创新绩效研究——基于集聚经济与舒适度的视角[J].经济学(季刊),2023,23(3):965-982.[Shang Yuping, Pan Zhou, Meng Meixia. Research on the innovation performance of Chinese urban polycentric spatial strategy:From the perspective of agglomeration economy and amenity[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2023,23(3):965-982.]
王晓红,李宣廷,张少鹏.多中心空间结构是否促进城市高质量发展?——来自中国地级城市层面的经验证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(5):57-67.[Wang Xiaohong, Li Xuanting, Zhang Shaopeng. Has the polycentric spatial structure promoted high-quality urban development?Empirical evidence from prefecture-level cities in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2022, 32(5):57-67.]
钱忠好,牟燕.土地市场化是否必然导致城乡居民收入差距扩大——基于中国23个省(自治区、直辖市)面板数据的检验[J].管理世界, 2013(2):78-89.[Qian Zhonghao, Mou Yan. Does the land mercerization expand necessarily lead to an increase in the urbanrural income gap?An examination based on panel data from 23 provinces (Autonomous Regions, Municipalities) in China[J]. Journal of Management World, 2013(2):78-89.]
王海荣,韩建力.中华人民共和国成立70年以来城市空间治理的历史演进与政治逻辑[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,33(5):12-19.[Wang Hairong, Han Jianli. Historical evolution and political logic of urban space governance in the People's Republic of China in 70 years[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Sci-ence and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2019,33(5):12-19.]
