囟门与说话早迟有关系？闭合过早会智力低下？崔玉涛来解答_网易订阅

link之家

链接快照平台

输入网页链接，自动生成快照
标签化管理网页链接

相关文章推荐

爱运动的灌汤包 · 外交部长活动_中华人民共和国外交部· 6 月前 ·

八块腹肌的数据线 · 生命清单电影_头条· 2 年前 ·

威武的豌豆 · 江苏省人民政府工作动态 ...· 2 年前 ·

重感情的地瓜 · 《乌龙院前传》是不是敖幼祥本人画的？ - 知乎· 2 年前 ·

淡定的跑步鞋 · PS beta版AI填充生成报错error ...· 2 年前 ·

Previous message (by thread): SMPlayer.net

Next message (by thread): Ignoring 'target specific option mismatch' on inline

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The idea is to instantiate function templates with optimized SIMD routines multiple times, then I can compile all my code with -march=i386, and select the best implementation at runtime. However, after already spending a lot of time restructuring my code around this idea, I discover that gcc refuses to compile this without having the corresponding target options enabled: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '__m64 _mm_unpacklo_pi8(__m64, __m64)': target specific option mismatch That makes no sense to me. I want gcc to emit those SIMD instructions verbatim in my code, regardless of what compiler options the user specified. What then is the point of feature-test macros (__SSE__, etc)? I don't get it. Is there any option or attribute I can use to make gcc ignore these target option mismatches when inlining? Or any other way to make this work?

Previous message (by thread): SMPlayer.net

Next message (by thread): Ignoring 'target specific option mismatch' on inline

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

推荐文章

爱运动的灌汤包 · 外交部长活动_中华人民共和国外交部

6 月前

八块腹肌的数据线 · 生命清单电影_头条

2 年前

威武的豌豆 · 江苏省人民政府工作动态上半年宿迁推动制造业“智改数转”提速进阶

2 年前

重感情的地瓜 · 《乌龙院前传》是不是敖幼祥本人画的？ - 知乎

2 年前

淡定的跑步鞋 · PS beta版AI填充生成报错error response image not found:1000 - 掘金

2 年前